Advanced Metering Framework (AMI) occurs as a different metering technique. The initial intent behind the approach was to make it possible for Automated Meter Reading (AMR). Consequently both these terms have actually ended up being common within the sector, a point which brings about much confusion.
Historically speaking AMR is the precursor of AMI. In other words the approach as well as innovations used in AMI were substantiated of the method and innovations ทาวน์โฮมมือสอง ราคาถูก of AMR. For objectives of our conversation we will therefore concentrate on AMI. However, one needs to have some insight into both approaches in order to have a complete image of AMI. The basis for both methods is established in the concept that utilizing specialized tools and also communications methods it is possible to gather information from metering equipment without having to literally read or engage with the metering device.
Usually speaking, AMR refers to the capacity to accumulate data from electricity, gas and/or water meters from another location as well as immediately via a number of various interactions networks, including RF wireless, power line service provider, telephone, as well as various other methods. The term AMI extends our understanding of AMR to refer to a system that can gathering thorough energy usage data more regularly. It also indicates that there is a bi-directional interaction channel between the meter monitoring system and also the tools. Having a bidirectional interaction channel the AMI method promptly opens the scope of capabilities considering that it enables information to be gotten and transmitted in between the metering devices and the meter management system.
Along with the networked nature of AMI modern technology there is one more vital difference when contrasted to STS modern technology. Where interaction within the STS technique is based on Tokens that are become part of a metering gadget, interaction within the AMI methodology is performed in-band to an interaction web link. The implication of this is that there is no demand to go into tokens to AMI metering devices. Rather, information such as just how much power you have actually acquired is instantly interacted to the meter using the in-band communications system.
One more fundamental distinction between STS and AMI is that STS is only intended as an approach for early repayment. STS can not be made use of to handle post-paid payment. This is really vital and you need to read this paragraph once more, as the ramifications on sectional title metering can be far reaching when this apparently small difference is understood. AMI, with origins in AMR, was initially created to automate the meter analysis procedure as well as supply this information to a neighborhood authority to ensure that they may offer a costs to their consumer. It was not made to handle prepayment payment, it was just made to gather information as well as existing it for payment.
Therefore most AMI meters do not have any kind of prepayment features. This is the exact contrary to STS which was developed as well as still operates ONLY as prepayment system. The reasoning of prepayment consequently in AMI have to be handled in software application at the meter monitoring system.
The meter administration and also vending service provided sustains both STS as well as AMI suitable metering systems. Therefore they can use customers an option of STS and also AMI innovations. As previously pointed out and also highlighted, for customers using AMI systems can offer both pre paid as well as post-paid payment choices.
While AMI offers several advantages over STS it is not without downsides. The main drawback of AMI is that it can not be released as conveniently as STS. The factor for this is that an interactions network have to be established prior to data can be accumulated from meters to several gadgets referred to as Data Collection agencies.
Then, thinking that the interactions network is in place as well as meters can speak with their Information Enthusiasts, the Data Collector have to be able to connect with the meter administration system where decision production can be done. This is uncomplicated to accomplish, the contrary is rather true. However this does enhance the cost of release for AMI. It additionally enhances the operational price as information needs to be communicated to as well as from the data collection devices and the meter administration system. All this interaction implies is: that there is a functional expenditure for data expenses.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น