Advanced Metering Framework (AMI) occurs as an alternative metering method. The initial intent behind the approach was to make it possible for Automated Meter Reading (AMR). Therefore both these terms have become usual within the sector, a point which brings about much confusion.
Historically talking AMR is the predecessor of AMI. To put it simply the method and modern technologies used in AMI were substantiated of the methodology and also technologies of AMR. For purposes of our conversation we will therefore concentrate on AMI. Nonetheless, one requires to have some insight into both methods in order to have a complete picture of AMI. The basis for both methods is started in the principle that making use of specialized devices as well as interactions approaches it is feasible to gather information from metering equipment without having to physically check out or communicate with the metering device.
Usually talking, AMR refers to the capacity to gather information from electrical energy, gas and/or water meters from another location and automatically using a number of various interactions networks, consisting of RF wireless, high-voltage line provider, telephone, and various other ways. The term AMI expands our understanding of AMR to refer to a system that is capable of accumulating detailed energy use information more regularly. It likewise suggests that there is a bi-directional communication channel between the meter monitoring system and also the devices. Having a bidirectional communication channel the AMI method right away opens up the range of abilities because it permits information to be received as well as sent between the metering devices and the meter management system.
Along with the networked nature of AMI innovation there is an additional vital distinction when contrasted to STS modern technology. Where communication within the STS approach is based upon Symbols that are entered into a metering gadget, communication within the AMI method is performed in-band to a communication web link. The effects of this is that there is no demand to go into tokens to AMI metering gadgets. Instead, details such as just how much power you have actually bought is immediately communicated to the meter using the in-band interactions system.
Another basic difference between STS and also AMI is that STS is only meant as a method for early repayment. STS can not be used to handle post-paid payment. This is really important and you ought to review this paragraph once again, as the ramifications on sectional title metering can คอนโดมือสอง ราคาถูก be far getting to once this apparently tiny distinction is comprehended. AMI, with origins in AMR, was originally designed to automate the meter analysis procedure and supply this information to a neighborhood authority so that they might present a bill to their customer. It was not made to handle early repayment billing, it was just developed to accumulate data and also present it for invoicing.
Therefore most AMI meters do not have any prepayment attributes. This is the specific contrary to STS which was designed and also still works ONLY as prepayment system. The reasoning of prepayment therefore in AMI should be dealt with in software application at the meter management system.
The meter monitoring as well as vending service used supports both STS and also AMI compatible metering systems. Consequently they can provide clients a choice of STS and AMI innovations. As previously mentioned as well as stressed, for clients making use of AMI systems can provide both pre paid and post-paid invoicing choices.
While AMI provides several advantages over STS it is not without disadvantages. The primary downside of AMI is that it can not be deployed as readily as STS. The reason for this is that an interactions network have to be developed before data can be accumulated from meters to several tools referred to as Information Enthusiasts.
Then, presuming that the interactions network is in area as well as meters can speak with their Information Enthusiasts, the Data Collector have to have the ability to connect with the meter monitoring system where decision making can be done. This is uncomplicated to achieve, the contrary is rather true. However this does boost the expense of implementation for AMI. It also boosts the operational cost as information needs to be interacted to and also from the information collection tools and the meter administration system. All this interaction suggests is: that there is a functional expense for data prices.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น